The Plenum – A Scripted Play

"The Plenum - A Scripted Play" deals with the performative, ritual and community-building moment of the plenum as a planning meeting of self-organised groups in a political and cultural context.

Over the course of a year, "Plena" were held in different constellations, which examined the group's own dynamics and found expression in a collective performance based on a changing script, similar to a theatre script or code.

The experiences made by the group not only served to document what had already happened, but were also immediately incorporated into the existing script as new "input". The constantly changing project could thus be designed transparently, modelled like a computer program, and enabled the grassroots democratic participation of all actors - regardless of pre-existing knowledge or experience.

Inspired by Jo Freeman's essay "The Tyranny Of Structurelessness", the creation of open and clear communication regarding the group's own structure and its "balance of power" was at the centre of the meetings.

However, "The Plenum – A Scripted Play" is not just a real meeting of a political group, but creates its identitary necessity through its intersection with the simulation: finding majorities (or unanimity), the distribution of power and authority within one's own group and the decision-making process were playfully tested in various models and placed in their political and historical context. The fictitious aspect of the meetings opened up scope for reflection on one's own behaviour within group structures. Many of these simulations were based on computer codes, board games and political constitutions.

There is always – often unconsciously – something of ritual inherent to every meeting of self-governed groups, which is of great importance for creating a collective sense of identity. The repetition of planning processes and the codified, group-specific communication rules determine membership of the group and create identity and purpose.

What remains of the plenum are simulation sketches, an (almost) founded association, an intensive debate about remuneration models in a non-monetary micro-economy and the development of sustainable structures for one's own cultural and political practice, which continue to this day. None of this is visible, except for the traces that we stigmergically leave behind.

These traces: the space in which we meet; the fire around which we gather; the cards from which we can read what has been – and will be – discussed; and the script, a constantly changing programme that will perhaps one day enable us to lead a socially and ecologically sustainable existence in the world of art and culture.